WEBVTT
00:00:18.120 --> 00:00:21.250
It's August 4th, and we have a lot to talk about.
00:00:22.000 --> 00:00:27.170
I get more listener email about diet and MS than almost any other topic.
00:00:27.550 --> 00:00:33.010
So this week, we're taking a deep dive into that subject with Dr. Tyler Titcomb.
00:00:33.660 --> 00:00:38.050
Dr. Titcombe is an assistant professor in the Department of Dietetics and Nutrition
00:00:38.380 --> 00:00:43.390
and a registered dietitian with a Ph.D. in Nutritional Sciences in the Department
00:00:43.390 --> 00:00:46.740
of Neurology at the University of Kansas Medical Center.
00:00:47.600 --> 00:00:50.720
In a moment, we'll meet my guest, Dr. Tyler Titcombe.
00:00:54.560 --> 00:00:58.890
When you're living with MS, a healthy diet can play an important role in managing
00:00:58.890 --> 00:01:02.970
energy levels, supporting immune health, and helping you feel your best.
00:01:03.760 --> 00:01:07.610
Dr. Tyler Titcombe is an assistant professor in the Department of Dietetics
00:01:07.610 --> 00:01:11.880
and Nutrition and a registered dietitian in the Department of Neurology at the
00:01:11.880 --> 00:01:13.890
University of Kansas Medical Center.
00:01:14.480 --> 00:01:16.240
Welcome to the podcast, Dr. Titcombe.
00:01:16.690 --> 00:01:17.650
Thanks for having me, Jon.
00:01:18.050 --> 00:01:23.120
Your training is as a registered dietitian with a PhD in nutritional sciences.
00:01:23.870 --> 00:01:28.390
And you've noted in the past that while we clearly understand the nutritional
00:01:28.390 --> 00:01:34.480
implications for diseases like diabetes or celiac, neurodegenerative diseases
00:01:34.480 --> 00:01:36.960
have historically been a black box.
00:01:37.900 --> 00:01:42.220
What drew you to focus your career specifically on this research gap?
00:01:42.890 --> 00:01:46.390
You know, I have a long-winded answer for that. I'll try to keep this short.
00:01:47.740 --> 00:01:52.290
If you're familiar with Camp Lejeune, which is the marine base in north carolina
00:01:52.290 --> 00:01:58.870
that had the contaminated water wells for about 35 years yes um i'm the first,
00:01:59.570 --> 00:02:03.570
person in my family in four generations who did not live on that base,
00:02:04.470 --> 00:02:06.940
so i have witnessed you know people
00:02:06.940 --> 00:02:11.870
i care about develop these terrible conditions you know by the age of 50.
00:02:13.830 --> 00:02:19.170
And really, I got into nutrition because I was a young kid and I was thinking
00:02:19.170 --> 00:02:23.140
very narcissistically and I wanted to try to prevent that from happening to me.
00:02:23.530 --> 00:02:26.680
You know, I didn't understand what the cause was then, but I knew that there
00:02:26.680 --> 00:02:28.380
was this thing happening in my family.
00:02:29.430 --> 00:02:34.830
And I went to college, and I had mind expansion, and my worldview grew,
00:02:35.830 --> 00:02:40.460
and I realized that while preventing that from happening to me is one thing,
00:02:40.460 --> 00:02:44.320
it would be really meaningful to me to help understand how we can prevent this
00:02:44.320 --> 00:02:45.730
from happening to other people.
00:02:46.680 --> 00:02:53.410
And my family was afflicted by alzheimer's disease parkinson's brain cancer
00:02:53.410 --> 00:02:55.730
bladder cancer you name it,
00:02:56.540 --> 00:03:03.450
but ms was not one of the conditions that affected my family and i did not want
00:03:03.450 --> 00:03:08.620
to have the like very intimate emotional tie with what my research focused on,
00:03:09.430 --> 00:03:14.810
um so i actually wanted to originally study MS during my PhD,
00:03:15.770 --> 00:03:21.330
but unfortunately the individual I had planned on working with in between the
00:03:21.330 --> 00:03:26.670
time I was accepted and actually got to Madison, Wisconsin for my PhD,
00:03:27.570 --> 00:03:33.090
her husband had a major health event and she decided that she was not going
00:03:33.090 --> 00:03:34.720
to take another student and retire.
00:03:35.800 --> 00:03:40.920
So I had to deviate, study something else for my PhD, but then when I was looking for a postdoc,
00:03:41.490 --> 00:03:45.630
I reminded myself of why I originally set out to do this, and it was to study,
00:03:46.100 --> 00:03:51.810
a complex disease that doesn't currently have a really good foundation of understanding nutritionally.
00:03:52.340 --> 00:03:53.720
That's what led me back to MS.
00:03:54.490 --> 00:03:57.920
So let's get to the question that most people with MS wonder about,
00:03:57.920 --> 00:04:03.050
and if you read the social media posts, some people with MS claim to have already found.
00:04:03.680 --> 00:04:05.990
Is there such a thing as an MS diet?
00:04:08.540 --> 00:04:15.340
I would say right now, no. I am open to the idea that there may be one in the future.
00:04:17.060 --> 00:04:23.070
The field of studying nutrition in MS is relatively new.
00:04:23.620 --> 00:04:28.690
If you go and you download all the articles that have ever been published on
00:04:28.870 --> 00:04:32.730
PumMed looking at diet and MS,
00:04:33.280 --> 00:04:39.360
You'll see that from, you know, the first article in 1948 until about 2014,
00:04:39.360 --> 00:04:40.510
there was almost nothing,
00:04:41.180 --> 00:04:43.650
you know, one to two articles per year, maybe.
00:04:44.210 --> 00:04:49.560
And then 2014 comes along and all of a sudden it goes exponential.
00:04:49.560 --> 00:04:52.470
Now we're getting hundreds of publications per year in this field.
00:04:54.450 --> 00:05:02.770
So we just we really don't understand how nutrition and diet you know interacts
00:05:02.770 --> 00:05:06.480
with the immune system and interacts with a dysregulated immune system for that
00:05:06.480 --> 00:05:08.180
matter in the context of ms,
00:05:09.310 --> 00:05:13.670
One day, hopefully, we get there. But today, right now, my answer is no.
00:05:14.600 --> 00:05:20.140
Your research has analyzed the data from the WAVES trial, which looked at two
00:05:20.140 --> 00:05:25.120
diets that are fairly well known to the MS community, the swank low-saturated
00:05:25.120 --> 00:05:29.420
fat diet and the Wahls-modified paleolithic elimination diet.
00:05:30.280 --> 00:05:34.820
For a lay audience, how would you briefly describe the fundamental differences
00:05:34.820 --> 00:05:36.590
between these two approaches?
00:05:38.330 --> 00:05:44.180
Do you mind if I start with the similarities absolutely feel free okay so starting
00:05:44.180 --> 00:05:50.860
with the similarities of these diets they both recommend reducing intake of ultra-processed foods,
00:05:51.870 --> 00:05:55.460
and they both promote the intake of fruits and vegetables,
00:05:56.390 --> 00:06:03.780
now where they differ is on basically which component of the diet these two
00:06:03.780 --> 00:06:08.010
diets pinpoint as the problematic component for MS.
00:06:08.840 --> 00:06:15.370
The swank diet is under the assumption that saturated fat intake is problematic for MS.
00:06:15.880 --> 00:06:19.250
The swank diet aligns really well with a Mediterranean diet,
00:06:20.140 --> 00:06:24.480
and it actually adheres really well to the American Heart Association dietary
00:06:24.480 --> 00:06:26.430
guidelines for cardiovascular disease.
00:06:27.460 --> 00:06:34.520
The Wall's elimination diet has a different And actually multiple food components
00:06:34.520 --> 00:06:37.040
that it is pinpointing as the problems.
00:06:38.430 --> 00:06:43.020
It assumes things that we're going to refer to as dietary antigens Are problematic
00:06:43.020 --> 00:06:50.590
for MS Dietary antigens are things like gluten from gluten-containing grains Casein from dairy,
00:06:51.730 --> 00:06:53.530
And lectins from nightshades,
00:06:54.620 --> 00:07:02.320
And the idea is that these antigens, when we consume them, they cause inflammation in the body.
00:07:02.670 --> 00:07:08.130
And by removing them, you can reduce your inflammation and have a favorable health impact.
00:07:08.730 --> 00:07:14.870
Your secondary analyses showed that both diets led to reductions in fatigue
00:07:14.870 --> 00:07:16.670
and improvements in quality of life.
00:07:17.220 --> 00:07:21.530
From a nutritional standpoint, what do you think is a common denominator here?
00:07:21.980 --> 00:07:27.400
Is it what these diets are adding like micronutrients or what they're eliminating
00:07:27.400 --> 00:07:31.860
like ultra processed foods or perhaps all of the above or none of the above?
00:07:32.680 --> 00:07:36.450
Yeah, you know, that's that's a great question. And and ultimately,
00:07:36.450 --> 00:07:40.190
we always want to be able to point a finger at like one thing. Right.
00:07:40.970 --> 00:07:46.120
And unfortunately, when we're talking about nutrition, any any time you eat
00:07:46.120 --> 00:07:50.120
something, you're consuming hundreds, if not thousands of different chemicals.
00:07:50.820 --> 00:07:56.270
And these chemicals, as they go through your body, they interact with every
00:07:56.270 --> 00:08:00.770
single system, every single pathway, and every single cell that's in your body,
00:08:01.120 --> 00:08:03.070
whether it be directly or indirectly.
00:08:04.380 --> 00:08:09.050
Nutrition is actually your second largest daily exposure after the air you breathe,
00:08:10.610 --> 00:08:17.620
so you know i to answer your question i think it's the combination of reducing uh,
00:08:18.810 --> 00:08:23.260
the things that we know are harmful from a diet and ultra processed foods that
00:08:23.260 --> 00:08:27.210
are rich in add sugar saturated fat and sodium,
00:08:28.070 --> 00:08:34.090
and then on the flip side increasing intake of foods that we know have beneficial compounds,
00:08:34.600 --> 00:08:38.810
fiber, phytochemicals, micronutrients, things like this.
00:08:39.850 --> 00:08:43.040
But yeah, I know, again, I'm giving you like a very, you know,
00:08:43.230 --> 00:08:47.490
vague, nonspecific answer, but that's where we are.
00:08:48.080 --> 00:08:53.520
One of your papers noted that diet-induced improvements in functional disability
00:08:53.930 --> 00:08:56.500
are heavily mediated by changes in fatigue.
00:08:57.290 --> 00:09:02.780
Can you unpack that in plain English for someone who's living with MS-related fatigue?
00:09:04.140 --> 00:09:14.320
Yeah, so we've shown time and time again that dietary interventions are associated
00:09:14.320 --> 00:09:16.220
with reduced fatigue and MS.
00:09:16.490 --> 00:09:21.160
That's probably the one thing that we have the best evidence on.
00:09:22.280 --> 00:09:27.580
And that secondary analysis you just mentioned, we were attempting to look at
00:09:27.580 --> 00:09:33.700
how, or whether, I should say, dietary interventions can impact something more
00:09:33.700 --> 00:09:36.400
objective, like disability.
00:09:37.170 --> 00:09:42.380
And to do this, we use the MS Functional Composite, which is a composite metric
00:09:42.500 --> 00:09:46.070
that includes the time 25-foot block, the nine-hole peg test,
00:09:46.070 --> 00:09:47.930
and the symbol digit modalities test.
00:09:48.550 --> 00:09:54.430
And we did show that those values, the MS Functional Composite values,
00:09:54.430 --> 00:09:58.740
reduced over time, which means a reduction in functional disability.
00:10:00.110 --> 00:10:05.150
But because we know that fatigue reduces, and we know that fatigue is associated
00:10:05.150 --> 00:10:10.960
with disability, we want to investigate, was this relationship actually due
00:10:10.960 --> 00:10:12.910
to these reductions in fatigue?
00:10:13.420 --> 00:10:19.000
And that's essentially what we showed. We showed that this reproducible effect
00:10:19.000 --> 00:10:24.660
that we know to be true, that diets reduce fatigue, that reduction in fatigue
00:10:24.660 --> 00:10:28.310
is actually what was associated with the reduction in functional disability.
00:10:29.010 --> 00:10:36.790
So, you know, to kind of unpack that, we did not show that these diets impact
00:10:36.930 --> 00:10:39.010
MS disability accumulation.
00:10:39.890 --> 00:10:47.120
But what we did show is that they may be indirectly impacting at least the subjective
00:10:47.120 --> 00:10:48.920
experience of disability.
00:10:49.520 --> 00:10:53.570
You know, reducing fatigue maybe makes people more able to do things,
00:10:53.570 --> 00:10:58.680
and therefore they experience reductions in disability as far as we measured them.
00:10:59.860 --> 00:11:03.820
I've heard that one of the most challenging aspects of conducting a clinical
00:11:03.820 --> 00:11:08.950
trial that's focused on diet is that, as many of us well know,
00:11:09.610 --> 00:11:11.660
staying on a diet is hard.
00:11:12.550 --> 00:11:16.840
Now, during the pandemic, I think you analyzed interviews with clinical trial
00:11:16.840 --> 00:11:23.000
participants and their support partners to look at the barriers and facilitators to sticking to a diet.
00:11:23.840 --> 00:11:28.280
What are the biggest real-world hurdles people face when trying to change up
00:11:28.280 --> 00:11:30.500
their eating habits after a diagnosis?
00:11:31.590 --> 00:11:38.490
You know, one of the things that I see in my faculty practice clinic regularly is.
00:11:40.490 --> 00:11:45.410
Is that a lack of support is really detrimental to changing behavior.
00:11:46.120 --> 00:11:52.800
So, you know, I've had some patients where they personally are really motivated,
00:11:53.400 --> 00:11:55.910
to change their diets and try to be healthier.
00:11:56.700 --> 00:12:02.260
And I will have conversations with them about, you know, how supportive of this
00:12:02.260 --> 00:12:06.880
is your home environment? Like, you know, do you have children you have to be cooking for?
00:12:06.900 --> 00:12:10.560
Or do you have a supportive spouse? You know, things like this.
00:12:11.330 --> 00:12:16.100
And the biggest barrier that I encounter, and even in that paper you mentioned,
00:12:16.100 --> 00:12:19.870
this was one of the top barriers, was a lack of support from the home environment.
00:12:21.080 --> 00:12:26.240
So in order to facilitate, you know, healthy dietary changes.
00:12:27.610 --> 00:12:32.990
If my patient who's, you know, in my exam room with me, if their spouse is with
00:12:32.990 --> 00:12:36.330
them, I will talk to their spouse about what their spouse needs to be doing
00:12:36.330 --> 00:12:41.070
as well to help support the person who's living with MS and changing their diet.
00:12:41.830 --> 00:12:47.470
I also recommend things like finding online support communities, things like this.
00:12:47.810 --> 00:12:52.140
And then, you know, I'm a dietitian, so I'm biased, but I think one of the best
00:12:52.140 --> 00:12:55.450
ways to get support for changing your diet is to see a dietitian.
00:12:56.620 --> 00:13:00.160
You know, the caveat to that, though, is that, you know, I'm one of,
00:13:00.160 --> 00:13:04.750
as far as I know, about 12 MS dietitians in the country, so we're few and far
00:13:04.750 --> 00:13:05.970
between and hard to find.
00:13:06.920 --> 00:13:11.760
But any dietitian should be able to help a person living with MS improve their diet.
00:13:12.720 --> 00:13:18.930
In your recent, I think, March 2026 secondary analysis, you explored how baseline
00:13:18.930 --> 00:13:24.830
lifestyle factors like physical activity, sleep, and alcohol consumption modify
00:13:24.830 --> 00:13:26.390
the effectiveness of a diet.
00:13:27.380 --> 00:13:32.700
In that process, what did you discover about who benefits the most from a dietary intervention?
00:13:33.550 --> 00:13:38.790
So this is a secondary analysis. So we have to, you know, have a level of skepticism
00:13:38.790 --> 00:13:41.570
when we look at these results, because they need to be replicated.
00:13:42.500 --> 00:13:45.150
But this is something I'm actually pretty excited about.
00:13:46.120 --> 00:13:51.360
One of the key groups of individuals who benefited the most from the dietary
00:13:51.360 --> 00:13:56.760
interventions that we did were individuals who had low physical activity at baseline.
00:13:57.450 --> 00:14:03.730
People who had high physical activity had less benefit as far as the outcomes we were looking at.
00:14:04.550 --> 00:14:09.100
So what this suggests to me is that people who are physically active,
00:14:10.370 --> 00:14:14.420
we know that they're doing one healthy lifestyle behavior, they may be doing others.
00:14:15.770 --> 00:14:21.240
So they maybe have less room for improvement. But where this is exciting to
00:14:21.240 --> 00:14:26.330
me is, you know, in MS, there's a certain percentage of people who are unable
00:14:26.330 --> 00:14:27.810
to do physical activity.
00:14:29.330 --> 00:14:34.370
And these are the exact people that that secondary analysis said may benefit
00:14:34.370 --> 00:14:36.410
the most from changing their diets.
00:14:37.850 --> 00:14:42.490
And you can look in weight loss literature, too, and see the same exact thing.
00:14:43.310 --> 00:14:49.000
You know not MS specific of course but the other group from that study who had
00:14:49.190 --> 00:14:54.080
larger benefits were people who consumed lower levels of alcohol,
00:14:55.200 --> 00:15:01.340
so if we take the same analogy from the physical activity is saying that people
00:15:01.340 --> 00:15:05.080
who had low physical activity have more room for improvement you might assume
00:15:05.080 --> 00:15:09.400
that people who consume high amounts of alcohol may have more room for improvement as well.
00:15:09.840 --> 00:15:11.800
But we actually saw the reverse.
00:15:12.410 --> 00:15:19.230
And what this may suggest, again, requires more exploration on this,
00:15:19.230 --> 00:15:24.270
but potentially the detrimental effects of high alcohol consumption outweigh
00:15:24.270 --> 00:15:26.760
the beneficial effects of a dietary intervention.
00:15:27.670 --> 00:15:31.730
Something that needs to be worked out further, but I think the fact that,
00:15:31.730 --> 00:15:35.350
you know, identifying that people who consume low amounts of alcohol and do
00:15:35.350 --> 00:15:40.010
low physical activity benefit the most from dietary interventions means that
00:15:40.010 --> 00:15:41.520
we can actually, you know,
00:15:42.420 --> 00:15:46.380
in the clinic, potentially identify those who would benefit the most from a
00:15:46.380 --> 00:15:48.290
referral to a dietician, for example.
00:15:49.150 --> 00:15:54.700
People often associate malnutrition with being underweight, but you've actively
00:15:54.700 --> 00:15:58.840
reviewed screening methods for malnutrition in chronic disease populations.
00:15:59.460 --> 00:16:05.220
So what should patients and clinicians be looking out for to ensure that a restrictive
00:16:05.220 --> 00:16:09.260
or therapeutic diet isn't accidentally causing harm?
00:16:10.380 --> 00:16:14.220
Yeah, so this is something that I'm very keenly looking at.
00:16:15.760 --> 00:16:20.860
Interested in. So when we hear the term malnutrition, like you said,
00:16:20.860 --> 00:16:26.640
we tend to just automatically think about a person who's in a small stature body.
00:16:27.520 --> 00:16:33.020
The problem with that is that malnutrition can occur across the spectrum of BMI.
00:16:33.790 --> 00:16:40.210
So whether someone lives in a smaller body or someone lives in a larger body,
00:16:40.550 --> 00:16:43.700
risk of malnutrition, you know, is the same.
00:16:44.680 --> 00:16:49.820
So when a person has a reduction in appetite due to one reason or another,
00:16:49.820 --> 00:16:55.140
and they're losing weight without trying to, those are the two key considerations
00:16:55.140 --> 00:16:59.380
when we're talking about protein, energy, malnutrition in the context of chronic disease.
00:16:59.880 --> 00:17:04.290
And obviously this is biased, but I would say that, you know,
00:17:04.290 --> 00:17:08.900
somewhere around 70 to 80 percent of the referrals to my faculty practice clinic
00:17:08.900 --> 00:17:10.690
are for these individuals,
00:17:11.690 --> 00:17:17.030
so you know when we're talking about you know especially some of these ms diets
00:17:17.030 --> 00:17:21.980
that are very restrictive and they eliminate complete food groups,
00:17:23.000 --> 00:17:30.160
in doing so uh you know we're we're removing potentially a source of key nutrients,
00:17:31.240 --> 00:17:39.680
um there also sometimes is this this thing occurs where a person will.
00:17:40.870 --> 00:17:47.220
Develop what's called orthorexia orthorexia is essentially the fear of consuming
00:17:47.220 --> 00:17:50.640
something wrong because it will cause a symptom,
00:17:51.870 --> 00:17:54.360
and when orthorexia takes hold.
00:17:56.060 --> 00:18:00.770
Um you know people will start socially isolating they won't go out to restaurants
00:18:00.770 --> 00:18:04.710
they won't go to family gatherings because they might eat the wrong food or
00:18:04.710 --> 00:18:07.310
they might eat a food that's contaminated with something,
00:18:08.730 --> 00:18:16.480
And that situation alone is a big risk factor for malnutrition, social isolation.
00:18:17.420 --> 00:18:22.440
So, you know, in my practice, I don't recommend super restricted diets.
00:18:22.800 --> 00:18:27.340
I actually encourage people to eat things that make them happy,
00:18:27.830 --> 00:18:31.300
but we're going to put some framework around it, some guidelines about,
00:18:31.750 --> 00:18:35.980
you know, the quantity, the portion size, and how frequently we're doing this.
00:18:37.080 --> 00:18:42.660
So, you know, a clinician, if you have a patient who's, you know,
00:18:43.010 --> 00:18:48.150
discussing that if they eat, pick a dietary component,
00:18:49.060 --> 00:18:52.300
and it causes some sort of symptom, so they completely avoid it,
00:18:53.200 --> 00:18:57.040
that might be an individual who would benefit from a referral to a dietician
00:18:57.040 --> 00:18:58.760
to kind of unpack that a little bit.
00:19:00.020 --> 00:19:04.810
You've published work highlighting that despite the massive role that diet plays
00:19:04.810 --> 00:19:10.570
in quality of life, registered dietitians are rarely integrated into the standard
00:19:10.570 --> 00:19:14.110
multidisciplinary care team for a neurological condition.
00:19:14.790 --> 00:19:18.310
Why do you think that gap exists, and how do we close it?
00:19:19.180 --> 00:19:25.510
You know, I've put a lot of thought into this, and I don't have a real straight
00:19:25.510 --> 00:19:27.210
answer, but I have a couple suspicions.
00:19:28.210 --> 00:19:35.810
So in MS specifically, you know, MS occurs at an earlier age than a lot of these other conditions do.
00:19:36.590 --> 00:19:42.090
And in adults, you know, in the absence of food allergy or,
00:19:43.230 --> 00:19:49.400
you know, very specific cardiometabolic conditions that necessitate a dietician
00:19:49.400 --> 00:19:54.130
to be on the care team, we tend to assume that until a person becomes an older
00:19:54.130 --> 00:19:56.710
adult, they don't have nutritional risk.
00:19:57.430 --> 00:20:01.000
You know, maybe some outside extenuating circumstances like,
00:20:01.000 --> 00:20:03.410
you know, poverty, famine, etc.
00:20:04.450 --> 00:20:09.250
Can cause that. But just generally, we don't assume that people in their 30s
00:20:09.250 --> 00:20:10.510
are at nutritional risk.
00:20:11.380 --> 00:20:14.850
So I think that in and of itself is one of the reasons.
00:20:15.600 --> 00:20:20.280
Um another reason i think is that you know.
00:20:24.060 --> 00:20:30.680
I've mentioned multiple times how you know the the research area of nutrition ms is in its infancy,